Weight reduced Robotassisted jump training. - Revision history

Cljak12 at 13:22, 21 August 2019

2019-08-21T13:22:51Z

Cljak12 at 13:22, 21 August 2019

2019-08-21T13:22:37Z

Cljak12 at 13:22, 21 August 2019

2019-08-21T13:22:14Z

Mclau16 at 13:08, 21 August 2019

2019-08-21T13:08:48Z

Mclau16 at 14:19, 20 June 2019

2019-06-20T14:19:00Z

Mclau16 at 14:18, 20 June 2019

2019-06-20T14:18:04Z

Mclau16 at 14:17, 20 June 2019

2019-06-20T14:17:57Z

Mclau16 at 14:17, 20 June 2019

2019-06-20T14:17:47Z

Mclau16 at 14:16, 20 June 2019

2019-06-20T14:16:31Z

Cljak12 at 15:06, 4 March 2019

2019-03-04T15:06:07Z

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 By
-mclau16@student.sdu.dk
+mclau16@student.sdu.dk and
 maklo16@student.sdu.dk

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:Overspeed bachelor rto.PNG|300px|thumb|right|Setup using RTL and specially designed bench]]
 The present study examines the use of robots in overspeed training, for improving velocity, power output and reducing impact forces in a jump. The purpose of the study was to enhance novel jump training, by creating programs to RoboTrainer One with different types of weight reducing methods and evaluate the effects in comparison with present overspeed training methods and a control experiment without bodyweight reduction. All methods were tested with three degrees of bodyweight reduction: 10-, 20-, and 30%. The different methods and programs tested in the study are the following:<br />
@@ Line 14: / Line 11: @@
 Conclusion: <br />
 The RoboTrainer programs Isotonic and Concentric Isotonic did not provide a constant bodyweight reduction. Isoelastic showed some spikes in the regulation of bodyweight reduction. This was due to problems with the forceregulation of the RoboTrainer. The results from the kinetic parameters showed that overspeed training using a pulley system gave the highest values of TOV and PP for all degrees of weight reduction, and Concentric Isotonic at 30% bodyweight reduction gave the lowest PIF. The RoboTrainer programs gave all a higher TOV and PP at 20% and 30% bodyweight reduction, compared to the elastic band overspeed training method. The results for TOV and PP showed a tendency to an increase in TOV and PP, as the bodyweight reduction was increased. All methods gave a lower PIF than the control experiment, except for Isoelastic with 20%, and 30% body weight reduction. PTOF did not show a tendency to decrease as the weight reduction was increased in the RoboTrainer programs. The results were influenced by different uncertainties in equipment and data processing, and only showed the acute effects of overspeed training with different methods. For this reason, further studies including a training program should be conducted to see the long-lasting effects of robot assisted overspeed training.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 maklo16@student.sdu.dk
-[[File:Overspeed.jpg]]
+[[File:Overspeed bachelor rto.PNG|300px|thumb|right|Setup using RTL and specially designed bench]]
 The present study examines the use of robots in overspeed training, for improving velocity, power output and reducing impact forces in a jump. The purpose of the study was to enhance novel jump training, by creating programs to RoboTrainer One with different types of weight reducing methods and evaluate the effects in comparison with present overspeed training methods and a control experiment without bodyweight reduction. All methods were tested with three degrees of bodyweight reduction: 10-, 20-, and 30%. The different methods and programs tested in the study are the following:<br />
 <br />

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 21 August 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:
	• RoboTrainer program Isoelastic, programmed to imitate the effects of elastic bands.<br />		• RoboTrainer program Isoelastic, programmed to imitate the effects of elastic bands.<br />
	• RoboTrainer program Concentric Isotonic, programmed to provide a constant bodyweight reduction only in the concentric phase of the jump.<br />		• RoboTrainer program Concentric Isotonic, programmed to provide a constant bodyweight reduction only in the concentric phase of the jump.<br />
		+
		+	<br />
		+	Conclusion: <br />
		+	The RoboTrainer programs Isotonic and Concentric Isotonic did not provide a constant bodyweight reduction. Isoelastic showed some spikes in the regulation of bodyweight reduction. This was due to problems with the forceregulation of the RoboTrainer. The results from the kinetic parameters showed that overspeed training using a pulley system gave the highest values of TOV and PP for all degrees of weight reduction, and Concentric Isotonic at 30% bodyweight reduction gave the lowest PIF. The RoboTrainer programs gave all a higher TOV and PP at 20% and 30% bodyweight reduction, compared to the elastic band overspeed training method. The results for TOV and PP showed a tendency to an increase in TOV and PP, as the bodyweight reduction was increased. All methods gave a lower PIF than the control experiment, except for Isoelastic with 20%, and 30% body weight reduction. PTOF did not show a tendency to decrease as the weight reduction was increased in the RoboTrainer programs. The results were influenced by different uncertainties in equipment and data processing, and only showed the acute effects of overspeed training with different methods. For this reason, further studies including a training program should be conducted to see the long-lasting effects of robot assisted overspeed training.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [[File:Overspeed.jpg]]
-Robotassisteret hoppetræning med vægtaflastning.
+The present study examines the use of robots in overspeed training, for improving velocity, power output and reducing impact forces in a jump. The purpose of the study was to enhance novel jump training, by creating programs to RoboTrainer One with different types of weight reducing methods and evaluate the effects in comparison with present overspeed training methods and a control experiment without bodyweight reduction. All methods were tested with three degrees of bodyweight reduction: 10-, 20-, and 30%. The different methods and programs tested in the study are the following:<br />
 <br />
-- Træningselastik som vægtaflastning<br />
+• Pulleysystem, using weight plates as bodyweight reduction.<br />
-- Taljesystem med vægtskiver som vægtaflasning<br />
+• Elastic bands to reduce bodyweight.<br />
-- RoboTrainer program ''Isotonic''. Programmeret til at aflaste med en konstant vægt.<br />
+• RoboTrainer program Isotonic, programmed to provide a constant bodyweight reduction.<br />
-- RoboTrainer program ''Isoelastic''. Programmeret til at immitere vægtaflastningen fra en elastik.<br />
+• RoboTrainer program Isoelastic, programmed to imitate the effects of elastic bands.<br />
-- RoboTrainer program ''Concentric Isotonic''. Programmeret til at yde en konstant vægtaflastning, kun i den koncentriske del af hoppet.<br />
+• RoboTrainer program Concentric Isotonic, programmed to provide a constant bodyweight reduction only in the concentric phase of the jump.<br />

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Der blev lavet 3 programmer til RoboTrainer One, som blev testet og sammenlignet med et kontrolforsøg samt 2 konventionelle forsøgsopstillinger hhv. elastikker og vægtskiver som vægtaflastning.<br /> Følgende forsøgsopstillinger blev testet:<br />
 - Træningselastik som vægtaflastning<br />
 - taljesystem med vægtskiver som vægtaflasning<br />

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 maklo16@student.sdu.dk
-/02-2019:
+Projektet undersøgte brugen af RoboTrainer One til overspeed training med henblik på at øge afsætshastighed og power i et CMJ, samt at nedsætte belastningen i landingen.
-Vejledning fra Claes:
+Formålet var at kunne optimere konventionel form for overspeed training med elastikker som set i andre studier. Ved brugen af RoboTrainer One kan forskellig former for vægtaflastning introduceres i denne form for træning, hvilket kan have en gavnlig effekt for atleter som træner efter at blive mere eksplosive.
-Lav nogle former for assisteret hoppe-træning som Robotrainer kan simulere.
+Der blev lavet 3 programmer til RoboTrainer One, som blev testet og sammenlignet med et kontrolforsøg samt 2 konventionelle forsøgsopstillinger hhv. elastikker og vægtskiver som vægtaflastning. Følgende forsøgsopstillinger blev testet:
-De første kunne være simulering af eksisterende træningsmetoder (fx hoppetræning med elastik). Lav derefter jeres eget skræddersyede Robotrainer-program som bygger på jeres ny-erhvervede erfaringer, til at lave den bedst mulige form for hoppetræning.
+- Træningselastik som vægtaflastning
+- taljesystem med vægtskiver som vægtaflasning
-Eksempler på disse træningsmetoder kunne være:
+- RoboTrainer program ''Isotonic''. Programmeret til at aflaste med en konstant vægt.
+- RoboTrainer program ''Isoelastic''. Programmeret til at immitere vægtaflastningen fra en elastik.
-* 1. Vægt-reduceret træning med elastik - lav praktisk hoppeforsøg med en elastik hvor data bliver opsamlet GFR data fra kraftplade.
+- RoboTrainer program ''Concentric Isotonic''. Programmeret til at yde en konstant vægtaflastning, kun i den koncentriske del af hoppet.